Articles Extreme Weather GSM 

“Weak” Solar Storm Sends 40 Starlink Satellites Plunging To Earth; Deep Snow Is Forcing Bison Onto Alaskan Highways, With A Feels-Like Of -91F Suffered In Howard Pass; + USA’s Coldest January In 8 Years

On Friday, Feb 4, a weak Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) hit Earth. The event was supposed to pass by uneventfully — it would perhaps spark a few auroras, but nothing more. So how did a G1 geomagnetic storm ensue? How did the KP hit level 5? And how did 40+ Starlink satellites come crashing back down to Earth?

SpaceX confirmed the event yesterday: “On Thursday, Feb 3 at 1:13 p.m. EST, Falcon 9 launched 49 Starlink satellites to low Earth orbit from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. … Unfortunately, the satellites deployed on Thursday were significantly impacted by a geomagnetic storm on Friday, [Feb 4].”

Dr Tony Phillips of provides the following graphic:

Two days before launch, a CME hit Earth’s magnetic field. It was not a major space weather event. In fact, the weak impact did not at first spark any remarkable geomagnetic activity. However, as Earth passed through the CME’s wake, some sputtering G1-class geomagnetic storms did develop, and it was one of these minor perturbations that hit the Starlink satellites on Feb 4.

Geomagnetic storms heat Earth’s upper atmosphere. Diaphanous tendrils of warming air literally reached up and grabbed the Starlink satellites. According to SpaceX, onboard GPS devices detected atmospheric drag increasing “up to 50 percent higher than during previous launches,” which is absolutely staggering — the heating was so extreme it was beyond the heating in modern solar models for storms 10-100 times bigger.

The company’s statement continued: “The Starlink team commanded the satellites into a safe-mode where they would fly edge-on (like a sheet of paper) to minimize drag. Preliminary analysis show the increased drag at the low altitudes prevented the satellites from leaving safe-mode to begin orbit raising maneuvers, and up to 40 of the satellites will reenter or already have reentered the Earth’s atmosphere.”

The Sociedad de Astronomia del Caribe apparently caught one of the reentries over Puerto Rico on Feb 7:

SpaceX says that the deorbiting satellites “pose zero collision risk with other satellites and by design demise upon atmospheric reentry—meaning no orbital debris is created and no satellite parts hit the ground.”

But how did such a minor solar event catch the experienced SpaceX team off guard?

The company launched 49 Starlink satellites into lower orbit for their usual validation phase. At first everything went as planned. However, it wasn’t before an ongoing geomagnetic storm –caused by 1) interaction with the Sun’s current sheet, and 2) a plasma stream riding the solar wind– began causing major problems. The storm succeeded in downing at least 40 of the 49 craft, most of which have now burnt up in the upper atmosphere.

At 210km (130 miles) up, the satellites were in the highest dangerzone for solar storms — they are at the key energy coupling point for a geomagnetic activity. However, this storm, by all measurements and standards, was extremely weak — it was a run of the mill space weather event, which explains why the SpaceX team decided to launch despite the forecasts. The company have shot many satellites into orbit during similarly sized geomagnetic storms, on ten previous occasions, in fact, all without issue.

No, a G1-storm / KP5 reading isn’t at all concerning in of itself, not in the slightest — they occur regularly, approx. 100-200 times a decade. The cause for concern here, and what they won’t tell you, is that this is a huge FAILURE for Earth’s magnetic field. In other words, it is evidence of our planet’s ever-waning magnetosphere, which is weaker than we’ve all realized and getting weaker all the time due to forcings and mechanisms that we simply don’t have a good grip of thanks, at least in part, to a chronic under-funding of the field in favor of the more lucrative rewards offered by fairy-tales such as ‘anthropogenic global warming’.

But to say we don’t know anything would inaccurate. We do have a limited, though tried-and-tested, understanding of the factors involved, which include two key players: 1) low solar activity, and 2) our planet’s migrating magnetic poles.

Basically, as Earth loses its dipole magnetic shape, due to the shifting of its poles, the overall field strength is weakening. Earth is effectively losing its protective shield against energy from space, meaning every enhancement of the solar wind, every crossing of the Sun’s current sheet, and every CME is having a larger and larger impact than it ordinarily would, both directly on the upper atmosphere, and also indirectly through the ionosphere’s equator-traveling waves that come from the aurora.

In the year 2000, we knew the field had lost 10 percent of its strength since the 1800s. Another 5 percent was lost by 2010. Further accelerations occurred in recent years, 2015 and 2017, but we laymen were not privy to any additional loss data–with guesses on why that might be quickly sending you down a conspiracy rabbit hole.

Given the last solid data point we have, that of 2010, our magnetic field should have handled this recent impact far better. Those Starlink satellites should not have been taken out — I can picture SpaceX team still scratching their heads. And while this is a small blow for a man (Musk), it poses a much bigger blow for mankind: What happens when the ‘big one’ hits? One on the heels of a large coronal hole stream, for example? What happens when that monstrous X-class solar flare is fired directly at us?

Bottom line, the Sun is capable of muchm much more, particularly at this junction of the solar cycle. The ‘ramp-up’ of SC25 isn’t expected to reach its Max until 2024-2025, meaning we could have 4 years left of ever-increasing threat. And worse than downing a few satellites, a powerful X-flare (an X9+) would pose problems to the electrical infrastructure across the planet.

Prepare for a grid-down scenario.

One could be coming.


Deep Snow Is Forcing Bison Onto Alaskan Highways…

Bison have been spending their winters in the farmlands near Delta Junction for decades. But this year’s deep, icy snow pack has forced the animals to forage at farms and travel on roadways, reports

The below video shows what can happen when driver meets bison on a roadway — with no other way to get around the vehicle, except through deep snow off the sides of the road, the bison charged and trampled over the top of a car:

The car was seriously damaged, but the driver reportedly was OK.

“They’re having a tough time right now, getting through that ice crust and getting to their normal forage,” said Clint Cooper, who works for the local Fish and Game Department.

Cooper said that the December storms that dumped snow have made it very hard for the animals to move around and forage, adding that “the bison are sticking to the road more, more so than normal, that’s for sure. They’re doing whatever they can to stay out of that snow with that crust on the top. There’s been quite a few folks that’ve expressed some concern about the bison being on the roads,” he said. “And I’ve talked to a few people who’ve had some damage to their vehicle.”

With A Feels-Like Of -91F Logged In Howard Pass

A weak and wavy meridional jet stream flow has effectively locked North America’s COLD up north this week –particularly the Easts’– where it is proving brutal and record-challenging.

Bettles, located in north-central Alaska, logged a low of -51F recently, well below the locale’s average of -15F. Daytime highs in Bettles have also struggled, peaking at barely -25F last weekend. And the situation has been similar across much of Alaska:

Prudhoe Bay, for example, on the state’s NE coast, saw an overnight low of -47F and a daytime high of just -27F; Nuiqsut recently hit a low of -53F; while the remote northern town of Deadhorse reached -50F, with winds making it feel as low as -88F (among the coldest ‘feels-like’ temperatures ever logged there); however, most impressive was Howard Pass, home to some of the state’s most extreme weather, which reported a wind chill of 91 below zero — a reading only a few degrees away from the town’s unofficial all-time record of -100F, set in 2014.

“The intense cold is confined to the northern part of the state across the Brooks Range and the North Slope,” said AccuWeather senior meteorologist Dan Pydynowski. But farther south has still be anomalously frigid, with Monday’s temps in the Fairbanks area struggling to climb above zero degrees — well-below the norm of 8F for the time of year.

“The jet stream is running through the middle of the state, with the polar vortex and Arctic air trapped over northern Alaska producing dangerous low temperatures,” said AccuWeather meteorologist Thomas Geiger.

USA’s Coldest January In 8 Years

According to NOAA –who use ground-based temperature stations proven to be skewed by the urban heat island effect– the contiguous U.S. kicked off 2022 with its coldest January since 2014. The month was also the driest Jan in eight years.

The average January temperature across the contiguous U.S. was 31F, which ranks it in the middle-third of January months in the 128 year record.

Other notable climatic anomalies in Jan, 2022 for North America:

“Bomb cyclone” batters Northeast: A nor’easter rapidly intensified off the East Coast from January 28-30. The storm dumped record volumes of snow and brought blizzard conditions along the coastline from Delaware to Maine. On Jan 29, Boston, Massachusetts, tied its greatest one-day snowfall record — 23.6 inches, although benchmarks from the late 1800s were toppled elsewhere.

Several other significant snow events occurred throughout the month, including the Jan 4 blast that brought a blanket of snow from Arkansas to Delaware and stranded motorists for 24+ hours on I-95 in Virginia. A snow event on Jan 16-17 also delivered significant snowfall from the southern Appalachians to Maine with portions of New York state reporting a record 18-24 inches of powder.

Florida Was impacted by a descend polar plunge, bringing the state its coldest temperatures for a decade+.

Bering Sea Ice Extent was its highest since 2013 (and growing), with Arctic Sea Ice reaching its highest extent since 2004.

And lastly, with an anomaly of just 0.03C above the 30-year baseline, it was also the planet’s coldest January since 2012’s -0.34C (UAH):

Climate is cyclic, never linear; and the COLD TIMES appear to be returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING, in line with historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among many other forcings, including the impending release of the Beaufort Gyre).

Prepare accordingly — learn the facts, relocate if need be and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers, while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions. And most recently, the CCDH has stripped the website of its advertising.

Facebook, in partnership with the ‘fact-checkers’ at USA Today have conspired to restrict my use of the social media platform for 90 days, meaning I can’t post anything new. I’ve been found guilty of contesting a scientific theory, which in today’s world is now considered a ‘violation’:

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email. And also consider becoming a Patron or donating via Paypal (buttons located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile). The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

Any way you can, help me spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Related posts

16 Thoughts to ““Weak” Solar Storm Sends 40 Starlink Satellites Plunging To Earth; Deep Snow Is Forcing Bison Onto Alaskan Highways, With A Feels-Like Of -91F Suffered In Howard Pass; + USA’s Coldest January In 8 Years”

  1. Michael Peinsipp

    Nuiqsut -54°F on Feb 7 22:53PM.
    But 1 or 2 degrees at that temp ya don’t feel it cuz you FROZEN!

    1. Michael Peinsipp

      AND wind chill of -88°F !!!
      Even Witches ‘things’ froze hard!

      1. Matt Dalby

        Or to revive an old saying from when I was a kid “it was cold enough to freeze the bollocks off a polar bear”.

  2. Ed

    According to the NOAA headline I saw it was the “coolest” January in 8 years, not “coldest”. Please don’t use such harsh language the AGW disciples might get offended.

    1. Michael Peinsipp

      You know people have grown weak when air modulations (Speech) scare people.

  3. William Best (Billy)

    Dear Cap. With respect to and regard for the Latest Antarctic Ice Area/Extent graphs in today’s, Feb 09, Electroverse, can someone give me a short reason or explanation of what I’m seeing with the Red 2022 data curve having departed below or to a warmer(?) or smaller indication than the mean of all data recorded since 1979. That to my eye is way more than what I understand to be a standard deviation. I tried to wade through Wikipedia’s definition of Standard Deviation and the first line starts with: “For other uses, see Standard deviation (disambiguation)”. I found this very helpful in that I am trying to add the new word to me, disambiguation, in my speech as much as possible which is not ever so far but it is a new goal. I toyed momentarily with the definition of “absolute average deviation” but feared that I might end up with a new clinical deviation so I abandoned that research. Am I correct in thinking that the Red 2022 curve’s position, as of 2/6, indicates that the South Pole’s icefields are getting dramatically smaller in area and extent, and if that is true and while coincidentally the surface air temperature is reportedly approaching record lows, there must be a tremendous amount of heat warming the ocean from below. I have yet to see any comment on this, at least to me, a very obvious visual departure from any idea of normalcy portrayed by that graph, compared to the hype about the UAH January temperature of a not very big deviation in relation to that graphs data points going back as well to 1979. The only other plausibly deniable theory would be massive undersea alien activity generating massive amounts of stealthy heat. Or maybe 10 or 12 nuclear submarines simultaneously having reactor meltdowns and we are being kept out of the info loop for obvious security reasons. Mustn’t upset the sheep? Please help me with my graphology. Enjoying seasonal mildish weather in Vancouver.

    1. Matt Dalby

      Most maps of sea surface temperatures show the vast amount of the Southern Ocean to below average, so warming from below doesn’t seem a likely explanation. To my mind this leaves 2 possibilities:-
      Stronger than average winds/more frequent southerly winds fragmenting the ice and moving it into warmer waters further north.
      Changes in the way raw data from satellites is used to produce the published figures, or data tampering to the sceptically minded.
      However, I too find it all a bit mysterious, and would love to have a genuine explanation.

  4. JNS

    Forgive my suspicion, but were these satellites taken out by the weak CME or was it sabotage … someone sending a message? I haven’t been able to figure out if Musk is a good guy or bad guy, but he definitely seem to walk a different path from the other ‘tech giants’

    1. Matt Dalby

      With respect to good guy/bad guy I think Musk is a bit of both.
      He’s quite happy to work alongside the PTB launching satellites and promoting renewable energy, electric vehicles etc. = bad guy.
      He’s broken ranks re. covid and vaccine mandates and has supported the Canadian truckers freedom convoy = good guy.
      In my view few people are ever all good or all bad, most of us being a bit of both, although obviously a lot of people will be more good than bad or vice versa.

  5. Just a messenger only....

    Talking about the waning magnetosphere and it implications…you stated it’s peak around 2024-2025…that a massive cme could do significant damage..but you forgot to factor in this other anomaly. ..the celestial rectangle of the 4 big jovial planets in 2024 with earth and sun in the middle…and factor in the deminishing magnetosphere! David dubyne of adapt 2030 on youtube did lots of research on this very celestial alignment and what happened history wise as well! In early april 2020 I saw this very celestial alignment via dreamtime…so my take is…it’s gotta be a biggy since it came from Spirit! Something to ponder here…and check out David dubyne work too on that very topic in 2024…he dates Oct to be the apex/peak btw.

    1. prioris

      I have found no scientific or other basis to the celestial rectangle threat. I ignore it.

  6. Kitty

    Or maybe the satellites were just lousy quality. Look at all of the consumer goods that have been recalled over the last few years for faulty components.
    Of course, many parts were probably made in China, so maybe sabotage isn’t out of the question. After all, it’s to Chinese advantage not to have the West have better communications.

  7. John

    I don’t believe a word that Space agencies spout, their make believe satellites don’t fool me anymore. I’m surprised that you still believe in the globe model, I did too until recently when someone asked me why I believe it, my reply was “because that’s what I have been taught from day dot.”….another lie to keep us in the dark!

  8. Ruth ONeill

    Please subscribe me

  9. William Best (Billy)

    Not being argumentative here but after Googling the average Antarctica Temperature s for April, May, and June 2021, June was very cold. One site, http://www.washingtonpost .com was headed – The South Pole just had its most severe cold season on record. The surface sea temp will only indicate the rate of melt of the sea ice extent and area the temperature recording and reporting folks can’t have it both ways I the extent and area are getting smaller and I think when the red 2022 curve is headed below (less?)than every curve above it, there must be a stealthy heat source underneath ice causing to diminish. I’m still curious about the notch in the Surface Snow Balance which shows a lurch to the right. there seems to all of a sudden be lots more snow than ever before. The snow above 3000 gigatons. Can some expert in the charts explain how they are derived please. Perhaps Dr. Roy Spencer? Thanks in advance. Billy B.

  10. John

    Understand that Solar cycle 25 has now officially began as of Feb. 26,2022. As a result NOAA has recalculated cycle 25 to be at a normal cycle (sun spots 190plus or minus20. Does this change any of your outlook going forward?

Leave a Comment