Crop Loss Extreme Weather GSM 

South American Crops Headed for Catastrophe as Antarctic Blasts Persist

South American farmers are bracing for another round of harvest-wrecking polar cold.

A new mass of cold air began buffeting the region Saturday evening, according to Brazil’s National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) — and by Sunday, frost had again ravaged the midwest and southwest of Rio Grande do Sul, west of Santa Catarina, and south of Parana.

During the past two decades, Brazilian farmers have gotten used to “double-cropping” soybeans and corn.

This is the main reason Brazil has risen to become the main competitor to U.S. exports for both crops — double-cropping has allowed the country to efficiently use its unique climate to increase annual yields.

However, the window is tight.

And, as you’d expect, the Grand Solar Minimum appears to be closing that window.

Like most tropical locales, Brazil has a distinct wet and dry season. Over the past few decades, the wet season has lasted roughly September to May, allowing a good soybean crop in the spring and summer, followed by a good front-half to the corn season before turning drier.

If the season does not go as planned for any reason, catastrophe can easily strike — and this is the reality this season, as record-breaking cold has routinely buffeted the region.


The soybean season got off to a horribly late start due to late-arriving rains.

And when those rains did finally arrive, they persisted throughout the soybean harvest, delaying things even further — as a result, corn planting was typically delayed by around a month.

The rains quickly shut down in late-March/early-April, and the real worry set in.

Compounding the misery were those debilitating frosts.

Production numbers have continued to be slashed every time a new forecast is released — many private agencies are coming in with well-under 90 million metric tons (mmt) of total corn production, while CONAB recently reduced its forecast down to 93.4 mmt, with the USDA pegging expectations back to 93 mmt.

Note: the recent historic freezes were left out of these estimates, so further reductions are expected.

The second corn in Parana –the second-largest producer in Brazil– is down 19% year on year at 9.8 million mt, according to the latest Parana state agriculture department estimate; however, and as is the case with the agencies above, the department says their next report –released on July 29– will include another downward revision in Parana’s 2020-21 corn output due to “frost damages suffered in late June” (revisions which again won’t take into account the latest bout of polar cold).

“Overall, of the 2.46 million hectares to be harvested, 88% are in poor or average condition,” said the Parana state agriculture department. “In this scenario, we should have a significant reduction in expected production.”

Additional strong frosts are expected to sweep southern Brazil on Monday and Tuesday, extending from the south of Mato Grosso do Sul to the border between Sao Paulo and Parana.

Any corn that survived late-June’s/early-July’s Antarctic fronts will likely be finished off by this latest round.


The cold is forecast to intensify July 19-20 across the South American continent, meaning more heavy crop losses for not only southern Brazil but also Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia.

And looking further ahead again, yet more harvest-wrecking cold is forecast to sweep the continent as the calendar flips to August — temperature departures of more than 20C below the seasonal norm are expected:

GFS m Temp Anomalies (C) for July 30-31 [tropicaltidbits.com].


Skyrocketing corn and soybean prices mean the potential rewards of double-cropping still out-way the increasing risks dealt by earth’s changing climatic patterns — but you need luck to succeed, and this is a commodity in ever-reducing supply as the Grand Solar Minimum continues its intensification…


The COLD TIMES are returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING, in line with the great conjunction, historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among other forcings).

Both NOAA and NASA appear to agree, if you read between the lines, with NOAA saying we’re entering a ‘full-blown’ Grand Solar Minimum in the late-2020s, and NASA seeing this upcoming solar cycle (25) as “the weakest of the past 200 years”, with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.

Furthermore, we can’t ignore the slew of new scientific papers stating the immense impact The Beaufort Gyre could have on the Gulf Stream, and therefore the climate overall.


Prepare accordingly— learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions.

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

Please also consider disabling ad blockers for electroverse.net, if you use one.

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here: patreon.com/join/electroverse.

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

So any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

Following drought for much of the growing period and frost towards the end of June, corn crops in Parana and other states suffered significant yield losses.

Second corn production in Parana, the second-largest producer in Brazil, is seen down 19% year on year at 9.8 million mt in 2020-21, according to a Parana state agriculture department estimate June 21.

However, the state department has already indicated there could be a downward revision in Parana’s second corn output in 2020-21, which will be released on July 29, due to frost damages suffered late June.

“Overall, of the 2.46 million hectares to be harvested 88% are in poor or average condition. In this scenario, we should have a significant reduction in expected production,” Parana’s state agriculture department said in a recent report.

As of July 13, about 89% of the second corn crop area in Parana was in poor or average condition and only 11% of the crops were in good condition, it said.

The data from Parana’s agriculture department also showed 53% of second corn crops had not matured as of July 13.

If the corn crops are between the vegetative stage 6 (V6) and reproductive stage 1 (R1), there can be a total loss of the yield in the event of frost, while crops between R2 and R3 stages can see losses ranging 30-60 bags/hectare (1 bag = 60 kg), according to a report of Siga MS, a tool created by the Mato Grosso do Sul Soy Producers Association (Aprosoja/MS) to monitor crops.

For the corn crops in R4-R6 stages, which are more tolerant to frost damages, losses due to frost are less than 15 bags/hectare. according to Siga MS.

Related posts

9 Thoughts to “South American Crops Headed for Catastrophe as Antarctic Blasts Persist”

  1. Deb

    In every conversation, whether offered by the global warmists or the global coolists, “climate change” is invariably portrayed as a bad thing.

    I have traveled from place to place, and in my opinion, most places have a considerable amount of crappy weather. Who is to say that a change would not be for the better?
    Seems like it would be a 50-50 chance.

    Take Brazil. They are growing sugar, coffee and corn, which are all bad for you. Maybe they will have to switch to spinach, cabbage and kale. Healthy food. What a concept!
    And maybe they will have a moderate climate, conducive to the lifestyle that now exists in NA.

    (I realize that many people are deeply attached to humid jungles full of noxious beasties, but only if someone else has to put up with them.)

    It stands to reason that any climate change will be better for some and worse for others. Give it a chance.

    1. Cap Allon

      Hi Deb,

      I guess my response would be things like sugar, coffee and corn store well, while those brassicas you mentioned do not.

      But I take your point — “change” isn’t always a bad thing.

      Cap

      1. prioris

        Grand Solar Minimum isn’t the main threat. Earth has more than enough technology and know how to mitigate it. As one bread basket goes off line, others like the Sahara will come online. The main danger is in the transition but overall we will do fine. Maybe millions of people could die but we will not be sent back to stone age because of it.

        It is the magnetic excursion/reversal which is the major threat. This could send us back into the stone age at some random time. There is also the possible microNova.

        1. astradene

          so, why is all the hype about? I surely need some answers too, like, is the solar minimum still awaits? the sun heated up pretty well last month.. its gonna result in poor food production in overall or other places will balance what mid latitudes will lose? and how the polar shift gonna mitigate or increase suns impact on earth, are the weakening fields not going to increase the impact of solar activity?

  2. Fran

    Brazil and Paraguay may be freezing, but those maps only show heat for Chile 🙁 a dry winter so far…another one in a drought that looks to be never ending

  3. Deb

    Cap, I have a dehydrator, so I can tell you that once dried, those veggies store just fine. And they make great soup! Humans will find ways to adapt.

  4. John Archibald

    Ladies and Gentlemen – friends of the Earth.
    All that plants need is sunshine soil water and CO2. And if the new solar minimum deepens as expected some food producing land masses will not be able to produce their quotas, so other countries will need to make up the food balance difference? The more pertinent question to discuss therefore is how we enlighten the general public about the true science of climate change and how we govern our nation’s world wide if this new solar minimum deepens significantly and or morphs into the next ice age???
    For sure we can see that bona fide true science proves that natural and intrinsic CO2 does not drive the climate by virtue of it being unable to transmit heat that’s hotter than the heat derived by water vapour (H2O) being heated by the Suns UV visible light and near/ far IR – given that x rays are largely removed by O3 and gamma rays are not a normal radiative heat emitting spectrum of our Sun.
    With the recent revelation the UK PM and all of his ministers are useless (BBC 2 20.07.2021; – Dominic Cummings tells all about how corrupt lying and moronic the buffoon Boris Johnston really is) the public must waken up to the fact our World Wide western style democracy is a farce and take matters in hand to work pragmatically and cohesively to boot these spivs crooks and fools out and form a proportional public democracy where a 70/30 cast vote has the say in all we formulate and do.
    This means every person has an equal say and vote and no collusion or intimidation of vote rigging will be permitted. One can remain with ones views and social leaning and go have tea with Queenie if one is so invited. But under a true public democracy one cant be persecuted or blacklisted for disagreeing with the majority.

  5. Petrichor

    It’s easy enough to say that the changing climate would enable crop production in the Sahara, — but the Sahara is either a sea of sand or hardpan clay-pebble aggregate. There are fertile soils there. How many years / centuries would it take for places like the Atcama and Sahara and Gobi deserts to evolve into productive forests or farmlands?

    1. Petrichor

      Sorry, I didn’t put “no” in front of fertile — it should be, “There are no fertile soils there.”

Leave a Comment