Articles GSM 

Solar Cycle 25 Shows Signs of Life: “New Best Fit” Released

Solar Cycle 25 has been slow to get going — sunspots have been relatively rare — and a recent “blank” spell lasting 2-weeks took most solar physicists by surprise. However, when checking back with NOAA’s official forecast, things appear to be running “on schedule,” perhaps even a little ahead; but remember, NOAA foresaw a historically weak Solar Cycle 25 –one comparable to that of Solar Cycle 24– and the agency’s latest update doesn’t sway from that.

“The sun is performing as we expected–maybe even a little better,” says Lisa Upton of Space Systems Research Corporation, and co-chair of the NOAA/NASA Solar Cycle 25 Prediction Panel. “In 2019, the panel predicted that Solar Cycle 25 would peak in July 2025 (± 8 months) with a maximum sunspot count of 115 ± 10. The current behavior of the sun is consistent with an early onset near the beginning of our predicted range.”

Below is the ISES Solar Cycle Sunspot Number Progression plot: the red curve shows NOAA’s original predicted sunspot counts for Solar Cycle 25, with the orange curve showing the new best fit.

Note, the new cycle isn’t looking any stronger, it merely has its solar maximum arriving sooner.

If current trends hold, writes Dr. Tony Phillips of, then SC25 could now peak as early as 2024, similar in strength to the relatively weak cycle (SC24) that preceded it.

“I’m not surprised that people are grumbling about SC25 being a dud,” continues Lisa Upton. “Weak cycles are typically preceded by stretches of spotless days, and they are slow to ramp up. All of this is consistent with our prediction.”

Indeed, NOAA have stuck to their guns for years (in saying SC25 will be comparable to SC24), but their forecast isn’t bold, it actually aligns with the majority of official forecasts (there are some outliers: NASA sees SC25 playing out some 30% weaker than SC24, while a paper from the UK, published in 2020, revealed SC25 would actually be historically strong).

Crucial to remember here though is that Solar Cycle 25 has never been the biggest cause for concern, because while a repeat of the historically weak SC24 will further weaken the jet stream, and further increase the prevalence of meridional flows and polar outbreaks (both admittedly very bad), it is Solar Cycle 26 where the real horror show is predicted to begin: NOAA data, as it stands, reveals that there will be no ramp-up into SC26 and shows all-but ZERO sunspots throughout the 2030s –when the cycle should be approaching its maximum– with the same also true for the 2040s –when SC27 should be awakening (click below for more on that):

Now the waiting begins, continues Dr Phillips.

As sunspot counts increase over the next year, forecasters will be able to tell if Solar Cycle 25 is *really* following the official prediction or doing something completely different.

Predicting the solar cycle is still an infant science, and much uncertainty remains; in other words, and as with most aspects of the modern sciences, while there is much boasting of state of the art tech and high-confidence predictions, no one really knows their ass from their elbow, and only time will tell…

As an example of a recent costly blunder, NOAA weren’t even able to forecast the weather for the coming month–even just a matter of days before its commencement. Below was the agency’s outlook for February 2021 (made Jan 21st) which called for a “warm month ahead” across the United States. But as we know, the month turned out to be the coldest February in more than 30 years, with children freezing to death in their beds in Texas.

NOAA’s Forecast for Feb, 2021:

Versus the Reality of Feb, 2021:

Enough said…

The COLD TIMES are returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING, in line with the great conjunction, historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among other forcings).

Both NOAA and NASA appear to agree, if you read between the lines, with NOAA saying we’re entering a ‘full-blown’ Grand Solar Minimum in the late-2020s, and NASA seeing this upcoming solar cycle (25) as “the weakest of the past 200 years”, with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.

Furthermore, we can’t ignore the slew of new scientific papers stating the immense impact The Beaufort Gyre could have on the Gulf Stream, and therefore the climate overall.

Prepare accordingly— learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions.

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here:

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has. So any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

Related posts

3 Thoughts to “Solar Cycle 25 Shows Signs of Life: “New Best Fit” Released”

  1. AZ1971

    The SIDC has been historically inflating actual sunspot counts for years. (I believe) before it stopped being updated daily had, for years, pointed out the major difference between the historical count (as was done by Copernicus, etc.) and the new high-resolution single-pixel sunspot count as done by the SIHO laboratory in New Mexico. I’m guessing that the SIDC is continuing the tradition of inflationary sunspot numbers and will do its best to muddy the debate.

  2. Matt

    If sunspot cycle prediction is such an “infant science”, why would NOAA try to predict what the Sun’s going to do three decades in advance? If they can barely get the next cycle’s activity right, what’s the point in trying to forecast three cycles ahead, when they’re even more likely to be catastrophically wrong? Have you ever considered that maybe they just haven’t made a prediction for those cycles yet? NOAA and the SWPC haven’t predicted anything beyond the next cycle, and your claims that they have are not only extremely dishonest, but very reminiscent of the people you criticize. The above-mentioned agencies did the exact same thing back in 2019, prior to the onset of the current cycle.

    In short, your claims that NOAA has “confirmed” a “full-blown” GSM, are, until proven otherwise, WRONG.

  3. Paul Roberts

    CO2-based AGW ‘science’ is predicting total global annihilation over the next century – but apparently one can’t question those forecasts, Matt, even though they can’t accurately predict the weather over the next month yet 😉 lol

Leave a Comment