NASA caught “adjusting” Global Temperature Graph — AGAIN

Geologist Dr. Roger Higgs (DPhil, Oxford, Geology, of has just released a new takedown of the anthropogenic global warming scam. Below is a summation of his findings–which you can find in full over at ResearchGate (Technical Note 2021-5).

In what Dr Higgs calls yet another manipulation of the data, in early 2021, NASA discreetly lowered the 2016 global average temperature –previously the highest on record– to make the year 2020 seem like the hottest.

NASA play these ‘games of adjustment’ all the time, and each and every time, without fail, their tweaks support the man-made global warming narrative.

Below are copies of NASA’s 1880-2020 global temperature chart ‘before & after’ their most recent “adjustment”:

And here’s a closer look:

This is a subtle change, but one crucial to maintaining the AGW narrative.

By reducing 2016’s annual temperature, government bodies have taken control of reality — they are able to fool the unquestioning masses into believing global average temperatures are linearly increasing and have increased since 2016, when the very opposite is true.

In actual reality –where those that apply critical thinking and logic reside– Earth’s temperature has dropped by approx. 0.7C since 2016 — this plunge is best reflected in datasets which aren’t subject to government data-fudging adjustments, such as the UAH satellite, which is maintained by former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer:

But those ‘mainstream’ datasets see the decline, too — just to a lesser degree:

How is this for disingenuity bordering on dishonesty? asks Dr. Roger Higgs, putting it politely.

A NASA statement released Jan 14, 2021 informed the world that the globally averaged temperature in 2020 was “slightly warmer than 2016.”

“The last seven years have been the warmest on record, typifying the ongoing and dramatic warming trend,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt at the time, who added: “As the human impact on the climate increases, we have to expect that records will continue to be broken.”

The infamous Dr Schmidt did not mention the altered 2016 data-point; or that 2016 still included the highest monthly temperature on record (red circle below); or the overall cooling trend seen since Feb 2016 (blue arrow below), which is continuing today.

Somehow, even though NASA’s own Land-Ocean monthly chart appears to show stark cooling since 2016 (above), the agency’s annual sets –the ones the MSM use and promote– show warming (below)…

Below I’ve included a cringeworthy interview with NASA’s Gavin Schmidt from 2013.

Schmidt only agreed to speak if it “wasn’t a debate” — and while I urge you watch the entire video, particularly the parts with the excellent Dr Roy Spencer (a real climate scientist btw), skip to 1:46 and then to 5:39 if you’re interested in Schmidt’s “la la la, I’m not listening to you” evading tactics.

Here we have NASA flat-out refusing to debate an issue which supposedly negatively impacts every living organism on the planet–and 2013 should be considered the ‘good old days’; today, in 2021, the climateers have worked a position where so-called ‘skeptics’ have no platform at all.

And guess which MSM outlet was among the first to trumpet NASA’s Jan 14 announcement?

Yes, it was left-wing ultra-alarmist The Guardian who on the exact same day ran the headline: “2020 was hottest year on record by narrow margin, Nasa says.”

Look for Dr Roger Higgs’ next Technical Note, 2021-6, over at ResearchGate, due next week.

Or check out his previous slides HERE, which prove that NASA wildly overstated the 1975-2020 ‘global warming’.

Our star, the Sun, drives global warming, concludes Dr Higgs; not CO2.

The COLD TIMES are returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING, in line with the great conjunction, historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among other forcings).

Both NOAA and NASA appear to agree, if you read between the lines, with NOAA saying we’re entering a ‘full-blown’ Grand Solar Minimum in the late-2020s, and NASA seeing this upcoming solar cycle (25) as “the weakest of the past 200 years”, with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.

Furthermore, we can’t ignore the slew of new scientific papers stating the immense impact The Beaufort Gyre could have on the Gulf Stream, and therefore the climate overall.

Prepare accordingly— learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions.

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

Please also consider disabling ad blockers for, if you use one.

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here:

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

So any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

Related posts

22 Thoughts to “NASA caught “adjusting” Global Temperature Graph — AGAIN”

  1. Alan Burdon

    So according to Dr. Roger Higgs, the 100 year lag from the effects of solar magnetism, which peaked at a Grand Maximum in 1991, will see temperatures rise until 2090 with a 3 metre rise in sea level.
    How does that fit with the correlation of the GSM and a mini ice-age?

  2. Charles Casaburi

    For 85% of the history of this planet there were no polar ice caps because it was warmer much warmer than now. Global warming assuming it is occurring at all may be nothing more than a return to a normal climate.

    1. prioris

      Earth is in an ice age at least 80 percent of the time. This is the real normal.

      1. James Hatem

        Earth is NOT in an ice age 80% of the time. During an ice age glacial advances are more common than interglacials. That is a very different thing. The moral of the story is to enjoy the current interglacial while it lasts.

        1. prioris

          You need to look at the nearly 100K year old temperature cycles.

    2. James Charles


      “ . . . this cool
      04:00 stable temperature arose once during the
      04:04 last 2 billion years {the last 12,000 years}
      04:05 of planetary history it also arose once
      04:08 during the 320 000 years or so
      04:10 of our existence as a species . . . “

  3. Yea, we can always count on nasa. They started the whole thing of greenhouse gases, as though we were living on Venus. They can’t stop now, since they have other huge errors. Somebody might actually question them! Now, I’ve got noaa not wanting to process my one stable tide gauge that shows sea levels going down. blah.

  4. Peter Shinn

    Your chart makes no sense to me.

  5. Peter

    Its all Self-Preserving lies.
    They have comfortable incomes, and lifestyles to protect.
    Plus inflated egos.
    Its the way its going to be.
    And there’s no stopping it.
    Whether you go off grid or not.
    The “Grande Plan” that has been in the making,
    will come to fruition no fail.

    George Bush Snr said it well back in the 90s.
    Its called “A New World Order”.
    And here it comes.

  6. Deb

    According to two of the above comments, “for 85% of the history of the earth there were no polar ice caps”, and “earth is in an ice age at least 80% of the time”.

    You guys should be working for NASA, lol!

    1. Winston Smith [Mr]

      Sassy, you got that right;). Earth has been in in an Ice Age for only the last 2 million years of the 4 billion total years of it’s history with avg 90ka cycles of deep glaciation down/up to the 40th parallels with 10ka “interglacial” warm periods like right here, right now with numerous 200/400 cycles of mini-ice ages [Maunder Minimums etc] within those interglacials just like we’re going into this next “Eddy” mini/maxi IceAgeNow. Can’t point out often enough that there is only 1/2500th of the essential trace gas CO2 in the atmosphere and that the same NASA/IPCC/WEF/UN clown show actors [like Schmidt] are the Bozo(s)/Patsy(s) in charge of the Ice Age Eugenics Now psyop/cull. Eugenics works and it’s OK. Cheers.
      15 hours ago

      1. Deb

        Winston- I followed your 2nd link and watched the video. At first this guy was making good sense. Something is definitely wrong with the vaccine and I won’t take it voluntarily. Period.

        However, he went off the rails when he said people who get the jab were going to hell because its the mark of the beast.

        Rev. 14:9-10 …”If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God…” etc.
        People who innocently get the vaccine are not going to hell, unless they also worship the beast.
        It is much more likely that the chip, which will be implanted in the hand or the forehead, will be the mark. Seems to me that when the sun goes apesh*t on us, those with electronic hardware implanted are likely to be “…tormented with fire and brimstone…”.

        The devil is the world’s consummate con artist. He likes to mix falsehood in with truth. Most people don’t know the Bible well enough to call him on it. Beware!

    2. Deb

      Winston, you are almost starting to make sense to me. Either you have had electroshock therapy or I am getting senile. -Deb

      1. Res ipsa loquitur and Logos Dialectic

        Deb, I wish it could all be Logos Dialectic all of the time – 90% of the population believes in some sort of woo… it’s the only world we got and it’s ephemeral. Dan has updated… doesn’t look good. Cheers. -RWB

        Dialectic or dialectics (Greek: διαλεκτική, dialektikḗ; related to dialogue; German: Dialektik), also known as the dialectical method, is a discourse between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to establish the truth through reasoned argumentation. Dialectic resembles debate, but the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and the modern pejorative sense of rhetoric.

        Excerpt from my coincidentally just posted earlier note to Dan:
        I can easily see a major migration to Electroverse. Cap Allon gets it… and I go where Deb and Herr Roger Higgs go because they ‘gets’ the big picture and I like a bit of Sassy with my IceAge, Mag/Rev, GSM and eugenics news.

      2. Res ipsa loquitur

        Only the non-Sassy become senile Sassafras. -Dino

  7. tomas Agent

    Idiotic claims by climate deniers (Part 738): Jan rounded-up (actual) annual GISTEMP data (ºC): 2016: 1.02 (1.0175) 2020: 1.02 (1.0217) Jun: 2016: 1.01 (1.0142) 2020: 1.02 (1.0167) Big shift, no? Umm… diff is actually smaller (0.0025 to 0.0034ºC). Note error bars are ±0.06ºC

    1. Scott

      This suggests to me that 2016 and 2020, being within the margin of error, are essentially the same temperature.

      Therefore our 2020 level of concern does not need to increase over 2016 levels and we can continue to ignore The Guardian. Phewww.

      1. Winston Smith [Mr]

        … this is what recommends we do to avoid conspiracy think.

        Deliberate ignorance: How we avoid information and why it’s sometimes useful to do so

        Trust the science.

      2. Winston Smith [Mr]

        … this is what recommends we do to avoid conspiracy think.

        Deliberate ignorance: How we avoid information and why it’s sometimes useful to do so

        Conspiracy theorists actively seek out their online communities

        This pattern suggests that, rather than leveraging [jacking] aggregate weather statistics, weather data promotion or modification campaigns should also be designed to amplify the positive influence of each person’s weather data statistics across that individual’s social networks.

        Trust the science.
        TPTB/Big Brother knows what’s best for us.

  8. Marly

    Electroverse, while I’m not able to contribute to your work — I do share it and truly wish I could give you a 1000 thumbs up for your accuracy — everytime.

    I don’t know when last South Africa has experienced as cold a winter as the one we are in now. Have no means of accessing reliable data over the last ten years, but where I live, the average night time temps were considered cold when they went down to 11 deg C — but over the years, it began to drop and running two weeks now, we are averaging night time temps, at highest 7 deg C, down to 1 degree. Don’t know know how accurate the official weather channel is – all I can say is that it is burning cold and feels like it goes into minus at night, while daylight temps hardly ever reach 20.

  9. Steve Case

    The 1997 edition of GISSTEMP’s Land Ocean Temperature Index (LOTI) covered the period 1950 to 1997 and had an increasing trend of 0.75°C per century. Over the next 22 years changes made to LOTI caused the trend for that 1950-1997 period to increase to 1°C per century. Looks like this:

Leave a Comment