Extreme Weather GSM 

Greenland Gained A Record-Breaking 10 Gigatons Of Snow And Ice Yesterday, As Northern Hemisphere Total Snow Mass Increases Just Days Away From Spring

Greenland Gained A Record-Breaking 10 Gigatons Of Snow And Ice Yesterday

Data from the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) shows that Greenland ice melt slowed significantly during the past decade, and that the trend has now swung to one of growth — media tizzies of ‘mass ice loss’ are wildly unfounded.

The Greenland ice sheet has been faring increasingly well in recent years. Since 2016, a sharp uptick in the Surface Mass Balance (SMB) –a calculation used to determine the ‘health’ of a glacier– has been detected, and daily/monthly records have routinely been broken.

Decades of reliable satellite measurements have allowed trends to be detected, and while it is true that the world’s largest island lost mass from around 1995 to 2012, that trend of loss has now reversed, and like the gradual turning of a vast ship, from 2010 to 2015 Greenland’s SMB changed course and has been on an upward trajectory ever since.

This is clearly visible on the below chart which plots the total mass balance since 1985:

[Die kalte Sonne]

Most recently, 2021/2022 is continuing that trend of growth, and impressive totals have been posted across the Greenland ice sheet all season. None more so, however, than yesterday’s 10 Gigatons gain which, it turns out, is a new record for the time of year:

10 Gts gain, March 14, 2022 [DMI].
10 Gts gain, March 14, 2022 [DMI].

More telling than just one data point, however, is the fact that the entire season’s SMB has now nudged above the 1981-2010 mean (shown below), meaning Greenland is on course to log yet another above average season–something that’s become a routine occurrence since 2016.

Above average SMB season [DMI].

To that point: Starting in 2016-2017, Greenland has consistently posted above average SMB gains (excluding the 2018-2019 season). The year 2016 also happens to coincide with the peak of global average temperature record. Since then, Earth’s temperature, according to the 15x NASA/NOAA AMSU satellites that measure every square inch of the lower troposphere (where us humans reside), has been falling and is now down some 0.71C:

If you want proof of mainstream media lies then you need look no further than their reporting of the Greenland ice sheet. The above data very clearly outlines the reality, yet here is how the Western corporate media –whose job it is to instill fear and forward agendas, not to impart truth– has been misinforming the masses: “Phenomenally high rates of melting have been discovered at the base of the Greenland Ice Sheet”, reports Cambridge Independent“Melting Ice Sheet in Greenland Becomes the Largest Contributor to Global Sea Level Rise”, reads a Nature World News headline from Feb 23, 2022.

The science, in all fields, has been hijacked by vested interests. And that quote from Dr. Paul Reiter again rings true: “As far as the science being ‘settled,’ I think that is an obscenity. The fact is the science is being distorted by people who are not scientists.”

Northern Hemisphere Total Snow Mass Increases Just Days Away From Spring

We may just be days out from the vernal equinox, but snow is going against the historical trend — it is increasing.

Looking at the Finnish Meteorological Institute’s Total Snow Mass for the Northern Hemisphere chart (shown below) we can see that things took a noticeable turn up as of the latest data point (March 13), bucking expectations for astronomical spring:


What we’re witnessing re. Greenland, global temps and NH snow mass is a complete impossibility under the global warming hypothesis. What further evidence do the climate alarmists need to accept the truth? And how can we aid their switch of allegiance? Genuinely. I think all of us reading this once believe in AGW, right? I know I did. And this is key — TPTB losing what’s left of their crucial support base –the trust of the masses– will likely bring the entire house of cards crashing down.

The COLD TIMES are returning, the mid-latitudes are REFREEZING in line with historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow (among many other forcings, including the impending release of the Beaufort Gyre). Prepare accordingly — learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers, while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions. And most recently, the CCDH has stripped the website of its advertising.

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email. And also consider becoming a Patron or donating via Paypal (buttons located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile). The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

Any way you can, help me spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Related posts

64 Thoughts to “Greenland Gained A Record-Breaking 10 Gigatons Of Snow And Ice Yesterday, As Northern Hemisphere Total Snow Mass Increases Just Days Away From Spring”

  1. Dallas Schneider

    Another Double-Peak of Massive snow/ice accumulation on Greenland this year!

  2. Dallas Schneider

    We would not want to call crazy “scientists” mad maniacs, would we?
    They do not deserve the reputation, do they?

  3. bwana Neusi

    Never miss an opportunity to spin the narrative –
    “Look our valiant efforts to reduce toxic carbon dioxide is starting to work. Global warming and climate change disasters are being averted, but we desperately need to do more – so much more”
    May I suggest that viewers look at https://joannenova.com.au for some interesting information on the possible effects of the Hunga Tonga Volcano

  4. Linda Fisher

    FMI total snow mass chart. It does not show whether snow is increasing, decreasing, or staying the same. All that graph shows is how much water [mass] there is within that snow. The warmer it is [within limits, it still has to be cold enough to snow] the more moisture there is in the air, and the wetter the snow. What that graph shows is the snow is wetter than average. It doesn’t tell us anything at all about the volume of snow. One cubic metre of wet snow can have more mass [water] than two cubic metres of dry snow. Which is why this chart doesn’t tell us if there is more, or less snow. Only that the snow that we have is wetter.

    1. Wizard

      How would you propose we measure snow if not by weight? Suppose we should count every snowflake that falls?
      The snow mass chart clearly points that there is a larger mass of snow accumulated on NH than the average of past 30 years. Significantly above average. More snow — more reflection of heat, less heat stays on the planet. More snow — cold winds travel unimpeded further than usual, further disrupting the climate.The fact that you so brilliantly point out is that the snow is wetter. What does wetter snow mean? It means it will take your shoveling arms 50% more energy to dispose of it and it means that the higher the accumulation is, even more energy will be needed to be rid of it. If it is not cleared, wetter snow will remain in that form for longer periods of time. Depending on other factors, those periods vary from hours to months. Go read the beginning of my post, to see what snow does for climate.

      To the best of my knowledge, Cap never claimed there is “more” snow in terms of “snowflake count” but that the increase of snow mass will result in further cooling effects on the planet, along with the Sun that is weakening, where we get more cloud-seeding cosmic rays etc etc

      If you work for a pay as a MSM news-spinner, don’t quit your day job

      And don’t forget your shots, so we can all be safe from you!

      1. Linda Fisher

        It would help if you understood the difference between ‘mass’ and ‘weight’ and ‘volume’. They are not the same thing. And yes, that chart clearly does show a larger MASS, but not of snow. The mass, is the water within that snow. It does not show the weight, or the volume, of either the snow or the water. What the chart shows is there is more mass [water]. And, wet snow melts faster than dry snow because it absorbs more energy [heat]. So you are wrong to say ‘If it is not cleared, wetter snow will remain in that form for longer periods of time’ and you are say ‘More snow — more reflection of heat’ but there isn’t more snow, there is more water and the wetter snow [which is what that chart shows] absorbs more heat than dry snow.

        1. Atom man

          This is an easy answer – weight is mass multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity. In physics this is g = 9.80 m/s^2 averaged over the surface of the Earth. In US units g= 32.2 ft/s^2.
          These are both approcimate.

          What does this mean? It means the weight scales up with mass by the same constant factor g.

          1. Atom man


          2. Linda Fisher

            “The weight only scales up with the mass by the same constant factor”. That is only true if the mass of whatever it is you are using is constant. The mass of snow isn’t a constant factor. It varies depending upon how wet it is. We don’t know from this graph how wet any given amount of snow is, either currently, or in the past. Nor do we know its extent or depth. Therefore all this graph shows is how much water [mass] there is in that snow.

        2. Matt Dalby

          The charts from FMI should be considered alongside the data at http://www.rutgers.edu/snowcover/index.php
          This shows the area that is covered in snow regardless of the depth or water content of the snow. It’s the total area of snow cover that determines the amount of sunlight that is reflected (although this is slightly complicated by the fact that snow cover closer to the equator will reflect stronger sunlight and therefore lead to more cooling). The FMI chart shows the mass of water that is contained within the snow pack, but DOESN’T say anything about how wet the snow is, for any given mass there could be a large depth of dry snow or a smaller depth of wet snow. It takes more energy to turn solid snow into liquid water than it does to raise the temperature of dry snow to the point it becomes wet. Therefore all other things (air temperature, humidity etc.) being equal the amount of energy required to melt the snow will be proportional to the mass of snow. Since the energy required to melt snow is not available to heat the surface of the Earth the greater the mass of snow, the greater the cooling effect.

        3. Wizard

          You are obviously an employee of the Ministry of Truth where war is peace, freedom slavery, and ignorance strength, and not an independent individual using own mental faculties (if such exist)

          I suppose snow is crystallized fertilizer, and not crystallized water, when you so much focus on “water in snow”. Next you will be proposing that ice cubes should be able to evaporate into the atmosphere all on their own because there is more or less condensed and frozen, or sublimed water vapor in them?

          Yes, we do confuse mass with weight, but only because average people do not need to bother with their own weight on Mars or Jupiter or whatever other celestial body. Last I checked, all our instruments measure MASS of bodies, and not the force they exert on the surface of whatever celestial body they happen to be on.

          As for the snow, you can’t keep a straight face and claim snow is more prone to be absorbed when it has a higher concentration of water than when it has a lower concentration of water. The process of snow absorption is most affected by the humidity of the soil, of the surface level temperature, of air temperature and various other factors, none of which include percentage of not-crystallized water in a crystallized water form (snow)

          As Matt below this comment also explained and repeated in different form my original point, you need more energy to melt the snow or remove it, because wetter snow is heavier and wetter snow can absorb more heat (water vs crystallized water)

          1. Linda Fisher

            “As for the snow, you can’t keep a straight face and claim snow is more prone to be absorbed when it has a higher…” I didn’t claim that. I didn’t say anything at all about snow being absorbed.

          2. Deb

            Seems to me a better indicator of where we stand vis a vis the ice age would be the area of the planet covered in snow year round.

            Simple, easy to understand, and should be increasing if the globe is cooling.

            Or is that too easy for you contentious lot?

      2. Dallas Schneider

        The important thing is we do have a measurable statistic, that can show the trends.
        Three sets of triple peaks this year with the bottoms well above the zero line.
        It is clear they need to take 4 Gigatons off the bottom, and add it to the top. That is change the -16 to -12 for the bottom, and add 4 to the top, making +12 max to +16 max. That should last us another 5 years,
        don’t you think?
        DS (Not BS, that’s my cousin in Nashville, TN)

  5. Galileo09

    I had a look at the two articles referring to the high Greenland Ice sheet melting. They are referring to studies conducted back in 2014 , which I find a bit strange to be publishing now. No update as to what is happening now, I suppose that they are hoping for more “unprecedented amounts” of ice water melts this summer, or the next, or the one after that.

    1. Dallas Schneider

      They do that regularly, drop out time!
      This is Deliberate Propaganda meant to mislead so the
      Public Money for Private Profit people can continue to
      extend their CO2 Monopoly.
      Those in control of CO2 stand to hold the planet by it’s proverbial Bolls!
      It’s reported starch (food), gasoline (energy), Oxygen (life), and plant food for greenhouses are ALL possible to create from CO2 with modern technology.
      Also, this is all important for the colonization of Mars & Venus as they both have CO2 Atmospheres.
      Consider the possibilities!

  6. Dallas Schneider

    We do have a changing Climate here in SW Florida.
    Out of the next 10 days we have thunderstorms/showers predicted for six days.
    Normally this is the DRY season, with rains not starting til May!
    I have noticed the rains starting earlier for the past 20 years here.
    Back in the single digit years we often had fires maybe 2-3 daily in the spring months. Alligators would roam the parking lots looking for a mate and a pond that wasn’t dried up.
    NOW the above forecast, after a 1/2 inch rain Saturday the 12th.
    Cool rain should help keep the temps lower also.
    Just another notch in the belt of the killers of the AGW Agenda!

    1. Dallas Schneider

      Last night 11:30 pm the thunderstorms hit with INTENSE Lightning!
      I woke up this morning to find my house thermostat out, not working.
      It made me wonder if it was so weak ready to fail that a lightning EMP
      had taken it out. A couple of new AA batteries put it back in operation.
      Received 0.6 inches of rain, second time in a week in the DRY SEASON!

  7. RonnieB

    I think all of us reading this once believe in AGW, right?

    No, I didn’t believe the Ice Age BS in the 70s, the Globull Warming screaming, the The World is going to flood crying, the glaciers are dying whining, and I for sure don’t believe in Man Made Climate Change Cråp.
    I haven’t believed fascists since I grew up in the sixties.

    1. Matt Dalby

      You’re lucky if you were never taken in by MSM bullshit.
      I’m more than happy to admit that I used to believe even the most alarmist claims made by eco nutters, e.g. that by the end of the centuary only the Arctic would be habitable and the population would be less than one billion.
      It’s genuinely scary to believe such things which is why indoctrinating children to believe in AGW should be regarded as child abuse not education. I’m glad I managed to discover the truth, because if I still believed what I used to I might be part of Extinction Rebellion and gluing myself to motorways.

      1. Linda Fisher

        Those of us who understand and accept the science behind AGW don’t believe the eco nutters either. We believe in the science and the science has never said that only the Arctic would be habitable and that the population would be less than one billion.

        1. Wizard

          Oh how gullible and naive of you! Go ask Greta Thunberg, she’ll explaint everything to you

      2. Deb

        Been there, done that, lol.

      3. Wizard

        As Linda was so observant, I am a tinfoil-hat-wearer but don’t think that would or should dq me from relaying this to you:

        The one billion story was predictive programming, to get most of the sheep used to the fact that there is going to be a major culling. The truth that most of those who pay and help pay for this agenda really want to kill off mankind is irrelevant, right? Georgia Guidestones are just like that, irrelevant piece of “art” in the middle of nowhere. In trusting that I won’t be mocked, hence the sarcasm

        Truth never was advertised, and never will be

    2. Dallas Schneider

      As I grew up in oil I knew how much the oil companies love CO2 to get the last remaining oil out of the formations, so I was suspicious from the very start.
      Now being a weather watcher from working outside all my life the major rains started for me in 1976. Iraan Texas experienced a flood that wiped out an oil tanker carrying wooden bridge across the Pecos river that had stood for 40 years. Flood stage was about 50 feet above river normal, 8 feet above the Bridge. My Dad had 500 barrel oil tanks right next to the bridge. He tried to fill the tanks when he discovered it was going to flood. One of the 16 foot tall tanks floated like a cork. The water line on the other tank was 8 foot above the now missing bridge.
      Then in the 90s Davenport Iowa had 3 100 year floods within 10 years. Definitely a change of pattern.
      Also in 1974 I read a prediction by Jeane Dixon that the planet’s poles were going to shift just after 2000. Didn’t understand quite accurately as to magnetic or geographic poles. Didn’t even realize the question.
      Now the magnetic poles are about to reach the 40 Degree parallel in another 12 months where they speed up quite rapidly to meet in Indonesia.
      MY Question: What happens when these poles get close to the equator sweeping past the sun every 24 hours energizing it like an electrical generator bar magnet sweeping past the copper wires???
      Consider that please!

      1. Dallas Schneider

        Is it not CO2, but the Electric Grid at 60 Hz that is the REAL Man Made danger?
        Remember the old VCR tape (Video Cassette Recorder) erasers did so you could record a new movie on them? They were placed into an AC (Alternating Current) 60 Hz (Hertz – a measure of an up and down cycle of voltage & current, a frequency) magnetic field.
        Have we done the same thing to the Planet???

        1. TW

          It’s 50Hz in UK, Europe and probably other countries too

        2. Robert Cannon

          It’s true that people that live by high tension wires are more prone to leukemia I think or some form of cancer. And the whole subject of dirty electricity, 5G etc is controversial wrt effects on biology. There is a book called Dirty Electricity by an epidemiologist showing problems in schools with a cell tower on the premises, or for example poor grounding causing stray EMF from the wiring, light dimmers, etc being potentially damaging. And they have shown elsewhere dna repair chemicals resulting from exposure to cell phones. So yes we’re being zapped.

  8. Dutchy

    I wonder how long it will take before they adjust the data, so that the facts fit the theory.

  9. John Galt's Offspring

    Its amazing how people can live in a self-imposed reality that cannot see true reality because their brain and mental ability to think is severely impaired. I have this problem here in Western North Carolina in Asheville . The Normalcy Bias has taken over completely. EVERYONE wants to move to Asheville, there have been literally thousands of new apartments and townhouses built in the last 3 to 4 years. And now gas is up to $5.00 (Diesel). Anyway, I really need these discussions to get my angst off.Well, with Linda’s insights, we do not have to worry about crops not being sown, critical food loss, all that. No need to be concerned with the snows in China and Russia shortening the days of wheat etc production. I really wish I could follow the MSM, CNN, and the “Truman show” stuff but I can’t. I pulled back the green curtain and saw the little man (read men) pulling the levers on the population. I can’t go back to accept a false reality. Thanks for my daily morning rant. Hot chocolate this morning with Linda. Whatta way to start the day! Good morning DS, Deb, y’all.

    1. Deb

      Greetings, Wizard.

      1. Deb

        Oops, John. Sorry!

  10. Robert Cannon

    The Mass Balance graph still shows a net loss since about 1995 but the loss is declining now. However the daily surface mass balance graph shows losses only in the summer of course but just looking at the graph it appears there should be an overall gain. And if there has been a net loss since 95 (except for a couple years) you’d think it would be very apparent visually (standing on the coastline or wherever). But supposedly they took down the signs saying how climate change is melting the ice. Doesn’t make sense to me anyway.

    1. Linda Fisher

      The mass surface balance also doesn’t take into account all the losses from iceberg calving etc.

      1. Cap Allon

        Calving is usually caused by an ice sheet expanding, not shrinking.

        1. Linda Fisher

          How it is caused isn’t in question. The fact is the glaciers are ice that is moving from the surface, out into the sea. When calving occurs, all that ice that is ‘calved’ is lost. Those losses are not accounted for in the mass surface balance figures.

          1. Deb

            Probably because they are being replaced, and then some, or else how could the glacier be expanding?

          2. Linda Fisher

            DEB – Do you mean the glacier that ‘was’ expanding and is now shrinking again? https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-how-the-greenland-ice-sheet-fared-in-2021

          3. Deb

            No, I mean the glacier that was calving and presumably losing ice, as per your previous comment.

          4. Robert Cannon

            The measurements are accurate but the target is literally moving, down the mountain into the sea simply due to gravity and the underlying ground temperature and changing terrain as the grinding smooths the surface. And we have the varying glacial surface height, the various melt rates due to the various jet stream patterns (re the one that caused the late melt in 2021 but then the fast melt in summer apparently). The data points measured are averaged, interpolated and extrapolated to get an overall volume, right? I can see where it may take several years to get a meaningful average to determine a trend. Correct me if i’m wrong.

        2. Linda Fisher

          “To that point: Starting in 2016-2017, Greenland has consistently posted above average SMB gains (excluding the 2018-2019 season).” You can’t just exclude data because it doesn’t fit with your ‘the big freeze is coming’ stance. You have to include the 2018 – 2019 figures whether you like it or not. And that figure adds to the upward ice loss trend.

          1. Linda Fisher

            DEB The glacier is no longer expanding and the year 20 – 21 was the 25th year in a row when the Greenland ice sheet lost more than it gained. The SMB doesn’t take into account the ice that is lost through calving and people mistakenly think that because the SMB shows a gain that Greenland is gaining, and not losing, ice. But when the ice that has been lost ‘is’ taken into account it is clear that, over all, there is an ice loss. And a rather big loss. From 1986 – 2021 5506 GT were lost.

  11. Mystic’s Mystic

    Over here in the USA the people running the government think DC is a toy for their personal enrichment. The new money making scheme is a premature thrust to get everyone in electric cars. Do they pay road taxes for new roads charging at home or in the charging stations? I bet roads are made from some petroleum byproducts. No fossil fuel no roads. Well that well reduce CO2.
    Now if you have to flee your home because the
    Green energy biased power grid goes down you can jump into your electric car with severely reduced range because of cold and snow conditions. That may leave you stuck on the Highway and if you survive your batteries funning down overnight imagine how long it will take to clear the highway when every car takes three hours to charge. I don’t think our government thinks beyond virtue signaling and kick-backs.

  12. Gordon Pratt

    Did all of us once believe in AGW?

    When Communism collapsed in the early ’90s all the old Commies became environmentalists. AGW was an obvious fake like so much of what the MSM promotes today.

  13. Ragnar Ravn

    One thing is a lot of snow on Greenland, but I just visited Madeira and they are having lots of snow and close to record low temperatures.

    It’s so incredible to be on a Subtropical island in the middle of March and it looks like alpine winter. I just read about the -8 on Cyprus and 50cm in Turkey.

    I can recommend taking a look of all the beautiful pictures of snow covered landscapes and car accidents on Madeiraislandnews.com.

    Quite stunning although not completely unprecedented that they get a bit of snow, but this late in the season is rare.

  14. Anonymous

    No I never believed in Global Warming.
    I believe in Climate Change in that the Earth’s Climate has changed over a period of close to 4.2 Billion years…the last 1 billion with H2O!
    The Sun, Sol, controls our temps not pipsqueak Mankind.

  15. Deb

    Been keeping an eye on the Northwest Passage since 2013, the one year that an ore ship, the Nordic Orion, was able to traverse the Passage.

    Eight years later, tho it’s been iced up ever since, AGW proponents are still touting the Orion’s passage as evidence of global warming and claiming that opening of the Passage is just around the corner, just around the corner, just around the corner…


  16. Jörg Hinsche

    „What further evidence do the climate alarmists need to accept the truth?“

    A legitimate question, but useless because:

    In 1984, Bezmenov gave an interview to G. Edward Griffin from which much can be learned today. His most chilling point was that there’s a long-term plan put in play by Russia to defeat America through psychological warfare and “demoralization”. It’s a long game that takes decades to achieve but it may already be bearing fruit.

    Bezmenov made the point that the work of the KGB mainly does not involve espionage, despite what our popular culture may tell us. Most of the work, 85% of it, was “a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare.”

    What does that mean? Bezmenov explained that the most striking thing about ideological subversion is that it happens in the open as a legitimate process. “You can see it with your own eyes,” he said. The American media would be able to see it, if it just focused on it.
    Here’s how he further defined ideological subversion:
    “What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.”

    Bezmenov described this process as “a great brainwashing” which has four basic stages. The first stage is called “demoralization” which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve. According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to reeducateone generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country. In other words, the time it takes to change what the people are thinking.

    He used the examples of 1960s hippies coming to positions of power in the ’80s in the government and businesses of America. Bezmenov claimed this generation was already “contaminated” by Marxist-Leninist values. Of course, this claim that many baby boomers are somehow espousing KGB-tainted ideas is hard to believe but Bezmenov’s larger point addressed why people who have been gradually “demoralized” are unable to understand that this has happened to them.

    Referring to such people, Bezmenov said: “They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You can not change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.”

    Demoralization is a process that is “irreversible”. Bezmenov actually thought (back in 1984) that the process of demoralizing America was already completed. It would take another generation and another couple of decades to get the people to think differently and return to their patriotic American values, claimed the agent.

    In what is perhaps a most striking passage in the interview, here’s how Bezmenov described the state of a “demoralized” person:
    “As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore,” said Bezmenov. “A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his fan-bottom. When a military boot crashes his balls then he will understand. But not before that. That’s the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.”

    It’s hard not to see in that the state of many modern Americans. We have become a society of polarized tribes, with some people flat out rejecting facts in favor of narratives and opinions.


    Now you know why people write their fingers to the bone here and on other platforms and nothing happens.

    If the above is anything to go by, this comment is actually useless as well, because:
    The facts tell him [you] nothing.

    As always, the commander-in-chief (see interview with Bob Dylan) has his fingers in the pie.

    1. Jorg, may I add a few other similar quotes:

      But to that point, people are content to place an ideologue above truth: “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduces them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim” — Gustave Le Bo.

      The stupidity of the blind acceptance of the CAGW/climate change/“Carbon Pollution” scam (and now the covid cult) cannot be countered because…
      ‘Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind in human beings at least a sense of unease. Against stupidity we are defenceless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed- in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical – and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.
      ‘If we want to know how to get the better of stupidity, we must seek to understand its nature. This much is certain, that it is in essence not an intellectual defect but a human one. There are human beings who are of remarkably agile intellect yet stupid, and others who are intellectually quite dull yet anything but stupid. We discover this to our surprise in particular situations. The impression one gains is not so much that stupidity is a congenital defect, but that, under certain circumstances, people are made stupid or that they allow this to happen to them. We note further that people who have isolated themselves from others or who lives in solitude manifest this defect less frequently than individuals or groups of people inclined or condemned to sociability. And so it would seem that stupidity is perhaps less a psychological than a sociological problem. It is a particular form of the impact of historical circumstances on human beings, a psychological concomitant of certain external conditions. Upon closer observation, it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power in the public sphere, be it of a political or of a religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity. It would even seem that this is virtually a sociological-psychological law. The power of the one needs the stupidity of the other. The process at work here is not that particular human capacities, for instance, the intellect, suddenly atrophy or fail. Instead, it seems that under the overwhelming impact of rising power, humans are deprived of their inner independence, and, more or less consciously, give up establishing an autonomous position toward the emerging circumstances. The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us to the fact that he is not independent. In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with a person, but with slogans, catchwords and the like that have taken possession of him. He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the stupid person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time incapable of seeing that it is evil. This is where the danger of diabolical misuse lurks, for it is this that can once and for all destroy human beings.
      ‘Yet at this very point it becomes quite clear that only an act of liberation, not instruction, can overcome stupidity. Here we must come to terms with the fact that in most cases a genuine internal liberation becomes possible only when external liberation has preceded it. Until then we must abandon all attempts to convince the stupid person. This state of affairs explains why in such circumstances our attempts to know what ‘the people’ really think are in vain and why, under these circumstances, this question is so irrelevant for the person who is thinking and acting responsibly. The word of the Bible that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom declares that the internal liberation of human beings to live the responsible life before God is the only genuine way to overcome stupidity.

      There is a weird naivety afoot in the world today. People seem to believe:
      Something like the flu virus operates with clockwork regularity
      Pre industrial temperature is the right temperature
      There is a giant CO2 knob that controls the world temperature
      The world is being swamped by sea level rise
      If you stop people having different views publicly they will accept your view
      More laws and regulations make things better
      None of these things has any basis in fact, common sense or observation. Yet they are widely accepted
      Some regard the Middle Ages as a time of uninterrupted ignorance, superstition, and social oppression.
      Illiteracy, superstition, and a lack of logic and reason ruled the masses. Life tended to be cold, brutal, and short.
      It would seem that this aspiration drives the modern Left.

      “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he already knows, without a shadow of a doubt, what is laid before him.” – Leo Tolstoy, 1894

      1. Ian

        Bravo bravo bravo you hit the nail on the head!

        1. Jörg Hinsche


          I do not believe that through “diabolical abuse” people can be destroyed once and for all. If I would believe that, I would probably not be a believing Christian, who is firmly convinced of the omnipotence of the Creator Yaweh.
          However, I share your opinion that only an act of liberation is necessary here in order to
          to get rid of the contaminated people (and with it also the gigantic worldwide fooling in all areas).
          The Creator will see to that in any case:
          Revelation 20:15
          But unto them that are perverse, and unbelieving, and abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, their part shall be in the lake that burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.

          It could be that the time of this liberation is not far away.

          Approximately in the year 3100 the magnetic field of the earth (the ever weaker becoming magnetic field strength of the earth was already mentioned here several times) will not exist any more and the sun will destroy or “clean” everything on the earth with its radiation.
          To this the statement in the revelation of John fits:
          Revelation 21:1
          And I saw a new heaven and a new earth. For the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and the sea is no more.

          Calculated 1000 years back we would be in the year 2100 thus at the beginning of the millennium.
          From today therefore still approx. 80 years up to the millenium.

          7 years before the millennium the Antichrist is built up to declare himself as God 42 months before the millennium and to take over the power in the world.
          What happens during the time (end times) leading up to the 7 years before the millennium can be read in the Revelation of John.
          Satan takes over the Antichrist and tries to kill as many believers as possible. However, Jesus will put an end to the goings-on and Satan will be in prison for 1000 years (abridged and simplified presentation).

          The followers of Satan and all the pack of lies, which has fooled us all our lives and is still fooling us, end up in the lake of fire.

          The unbearable fooling in almost all areas is over (for example: Medicine, nutrition, climate, research, teaching, history).

          The creator and Jesus teach mankind for 1000 years how it should run correctly or how it could have run correctly.

          Satan will be released from prison at the end of the millennium, and then, after attempting to wage war against the Creator with his followers, will endure eternal torment in the lake of fire. His followers who have allowed themselves to be seduced by him again after the millennium will be extinguished in the lake of fire.
          Revelation 21:8 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet were; and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

          Those who have not participated in the ongoing gigantic deception, have not helped spread the lies and have not done too much nonsense in other ways, will very likely be allowed to participate in the construction of the universe then liberated from Satan and his followers after the final cleansing of the earth and “dwell beside the tabernacle of the Creator.”

          This is actually the best news for all believers and helps to bear the at present actually unbearable condition of the gigantic world-wide fooling and to look confidently into the, even if distant future.
          Revelation 21:3 And I heard a great voice from the throne, saying, Behold, a tabernacle of God with men. And he will dwell with them; and they will be his people, and he himself, God with them, will be their God.

          So it is also obvious that after the universe which can be experienced by us was measured a 3rd time, the earth (with the creator and his people) is in the center of the universe which can be experienced by us, which points to its unique position in the universe which is not comprehensible for us.

          1. Deb


            Thank you for taking something simple and complicating it beyond comprehension.

            What is this, Controlled Opposition 101?

    2. Deb

      “Now you know why people write their fingers to the bone…and nothing happens.”

      The proof is in the pudding, isn’t it? We have probably all had the disheartening experience of trying to wake others up. Complacency runs rampant.

      The only point I take issue with is the notion that the technique of demoralization is being perpetrated upon the Americans by the Russians.

      That may very well be true, but it is far too narrow. It is being perpetrated upon the entire population of the globe by the would be rulers of the world, the globalists.

      1. Gary Mullennix

        Deception. Before Russia. Read The Real Lincoln. Unintended, he was the Great Emancipator. Purposefully, he was the Great Centralizer. By force and deception, the Federalists took over under the cloak of the Civil War and we’ve never been able to escape their grasp while we delude ourselves believing we are free.

  17. Doktor Seltsame Liebe

    I think all of us reading this once believe in AGW, right? … Well not ALL of us;) Some of us Boomers read:
    Robert Felix – Not By Fire But By Ice – Magnetic Reversals And Evolutionary Leaps – iceagenow.info back around 2007 or so and went to his website and eventually discovered the Electric Universe/Thunderbolts project and also Ice Age Ahead and now thankfully we’re here. Ice Age / Electric Universe men like Alan Caruba, RWF, Timothy Birdnow, Tim Ball, Rolfy ‘n the Cap’n are/were the ONLY guys that really get/got the big picture ww and cosmically.

    and we also watched:
    In Search of with Leonard Nimoy: ‘The Coming Ice Age’ (1978)


    Some say in ice.

    From what I’ve tasted of desire.
    I hold with those who favor fire.
    But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate.
    To say that for destruction ice Is also great.
    And would suffice.

    — Robert Frost, American poet.

    Robert W. Felix borrowed from the poet Robert Frost for the title of his book, “Not by Fire, But by Ice”, first published in 1997 and devoted to the science of magnetic reversals and the Earth’s ice ages. I read it first in 2010 and was absolutely floored because Felix makes a very strong case for a reversal that would lead to a widespread extinction of life at some point in the future. In the near, more predictable future, he said the Earth was heading into a new ice age. – Alan Caruba

    Discussion: Ben Davidson with Robert Felix | Magnetic Reversal Ice Age


    Timothy Birdnow
    The Next Ukrainian Famine (you might check this site sometime too… it’s an old RWF underground hangout too)

    … and some of us took geology and geophysics [incl. glaciation] in school and were even able to inspire Rolfy, Alan Watt and RWF [plus Mercola and Mike Adams conspiracy] on more than just a few occasions over the past 15+ years.

    … and now all these ice age/eugenics giants upon whos’ shoulders and planetary deck stands the able Cap’n of the good ship “Electroverse”.

    Hold your course… Manchmal funktioniert die Physik wirklich gut. Prost

    Must be doin’ something right.

    1. Deb

      I didn’t know he’d borrowed that from Robert Frost.

  18. .

    from side links list in:


    What Kind of Communist is Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy? The Most Dangerous Kind
    Sadly, this is not the first time that brutal communism hid its hammer from an unsuspecting public. ZELENSKY DANCING IN HEELS

    Epic Economist (some great get stuff while you can incentive vids)

  19. TheMronz

    So what Linda Fischer is trying to say is that the snow mass data is meaningless because all the snow could be warm snow? Well yes but it could also be cold snow, the latter being far more likely as the build up indicates the snow mass has little predilection for melting.

    Anyway, Al Gore insists here, there and everywhere would be snow free by now. But without specifying the type of snow? Tut tut.

  20. Jörg Hinsche


    What “controlled opposition 101” is, I don’t know.

    Maybe the following “conspiracy theory” is easier to understand:

    Late 2022/early 2023 will see the appearance of a blue comet (C/2017 K2), the appearance of which some Native American tribes have associated with the coming of evil events.

    2024-2025 will be the peak of the influence of the combined magnetic field of the 4 gas giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune (along with the Sun’s magnetic field) on the Earth.

    In April 2024, the Earth will be briefly pushed closer to the Sun, increasing stress on the Earth’s mantle. Cracks in the Earth’s crust, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions will result.
    Supply chains, energy, communications and infrastructure are at risk.
    Stability of planting seasons and harvest times in agricultural areas will not exist for some time.

    This lends itself to a seizure of control by the elite, military and government forces. October 2024 should be the time.
    Absolute control over food is the goal. Those who don’t do as they’re told will get nothing to eat.

    Could it be that in Luke 21, Mark 13 and Matthew 24, these things are being referred to?

    Luke 21
    10 Then he said to them: One Gentile nation will rise against another, and one kingdom against another; 11 and there will be great earthquakes here and there, famines and pestilences; and terrors and great signs from heaven [there it is, the blue comet] will come.

    Mark 13
    8 For one Gentile nation shall rise against another, and one kingdom against another; and there shall be earthquakes here and there, and famines and troubles. These are the beginnings of travail.

    Matthew 24
    7 For one nation of the Gentiles shall rise against another, and one kingdom against another; and here and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes.
    8 All these are the beginning of travail.

    How did Bezmenov say?
    “When a military boot smashes his balls, then he will understand. But not before.”

    Means: Only with smashed eggs the above statements can be understood.

    Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

  21. Deb

    Those who have the instruction of the Holy Spirit when they read the Bible understand it already, whether or not their balls are intact, or whether they have no balls at all.

    Controlled opposition are those who pretend to speak the truth, but are instead pushing the agenda of the Enemy. Your earlier distortion of the Bible tells me which side you are on.

    The internet, youtube etc are loaded with controlled opposition sites. Even many so-called Christian sites are nothing but controlled opposition.

    According to someone who has studied such sites, about 85% of the content is true, in order to mislead the population. The remaining 15% is pure NWO/globalist/freemason/PTB manipulation agenda.

  22. Jörg Hinsche

    Thank you, I now know which side you are on.

    1. Deb

      I have never tried to hide it.

  23. Jörg Hinsche

    Have fun in the lake of fire!

Leave a Comment